Modification and results of alloplasty of inguinal hernias in the experiment
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to modify the alloplasty of inguinal hernia known as the Lichtenstein operation by forming a cuff around the spermatic cord at the site of the opening in the mesh, which protects it from the proliferation of scar tissue and subsequent deformation. Materials and methods. In the experiment on rats, the surgical intervention was performed according to the type of operations for congenital inguinal hernias. In this case, in the control group, the spermatic cord was in direct contact with the opening in the polypropylene mesh, while in the experimental group, the cuff was formed due to the muscular membrane and peritoneum of the peritoneal process. Operations on rats were performed under general anesthesia. For alloplasty, a polypropylene mesh measuring 2×2 cm was used with an incision along one edge for the passage of the spermatic cord. The mesh was fixed to the anterior abdominal wall in an on-line manner, the spermatic cord was located above the mesh. Results and conclusions. After the operation, the testicle stopped moving into the abdominal cavity on the right, which indicated the completeness of the performed plastic surgery. The modified method of alloplasty of inguinal hernias allows to significantly level out the swelling and scarring at the site of contact of the spermatic cord with the hole in the polypropylene mesh, and the implementation of additional measures to prevent the cicatricial process in the form of laser irradiation allows to improve the results of operations. The combined use of laser therapy in the treatment method in the experimental group prevents the observed early and late complications. Laser irradiation in the infrared spectrum due to deep penetration into the tissue promotes the resorption of wound infiltrate and improves local blood circulation. Improved local microcirculation leads to early and rapid healing of this wound.
About the Authors
S. A. RuziboevUzbekistan
Samarkand
R. A. Sadikov
Uzbekistan
Tashkent
N. A. Allaberdieyv
Uzbekistan
Samarkand
References
1. Ботезату А. А., Паскалов Ю. С. Современные методы хирургического лечения паховых грыж (обзор литературы) // Вестник Приднестровского университета. Серия: Медико-биологические и химические науки. – 2020. – № 2 (65). – С. 3–12.
2. Визгалов С. А., Лис Р. Е., Поплавская Е. А. Влияние различных видов полимерных эндопротезов, применяемых для паховой герниопластики, на фертильность экспериментальных животных // Журнал Гродненского государственного медицинского университета. – 2013. – № 2 (42). – С. 32–35.
3. Гвенетадзе Т. К., Гиоргобиани Г. Т., Арчвадзе В. Ш., Гулбани Л. О. Профилактика развития мужского бесплодия после различных способов паховой герниопластики с использованием сетчатого эксплантата // Новости хирургии. – 2014. – Т. 22, № 3. – С. 379–380.
4. Гусейнова Г. Т. Влияние различных методов герниопластики на состояние кровотока в сосудах семенного канатика и герминативную функцию яичка у мужчин с паховыми грыжами // Казанский медицинский журнал. – 2020. – Т. 101, № 1. – С. 132–138.
5. Мокрова А. В., Зайцев О. В., Хубезов Д. А., Юдин В. А., Тарасенко С. В., Васин И. В., Барсуков В. В. Результаты предбрюшинной паховой герниопластики без фиксации сетчатого эндопротеза в эксперименте // Вестник экспериментальной и клинической хирургии. – 2019. – Т. 12, № 6. – С. 97–101.
6. Протасов А. В., Кривцов Г. А., Михалева Л. М., Табуйко А. В. Влияние сетчатого имплантата на репродуктивную функцию при паховой герниопластике (экспериментальное исследование) // Хирургия. – 2010. – № 8. – С. 28–32.
7. Протасов А. В., Кульченко Н. Г., Виноградов И. В. Ассоциация ненатяжной паховой герниопластики и патоспермии у мужчин репродуктивного возраста // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н. И. Пирогова. – 2020. – № 10. – С. 44–48.
8. Matikainen M., Vironen J., Kössi J., Hulmi T., Hertsi M., Rantanen T., Paajanen H. Impact of mesh and fixation on chronic inguinal pain in Lichtenstein hernia repair: 5-year outcomes from the Finn Mesh Study // World Journal of Surgery. – 2021. – Т. 45, № 2. – С. 459–464.
9. Sultan A. A. E. A., Elazm H. A. A., Omran H. Lichtenstein versus transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair for unilateral non recurrent hernia: A multicenter short term randomized comparative study of clinical outcomes // Annals of Medicine and Surgery. – 2022. – Т. 76. – С. 103428.
10. Bakker W. J., Aufenacker T., Boschman J. S., Burgmans J. P. J. Lightweight mesh is recommended in open inguinal (Lichtenstein) hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Surgery. – 2020. – Т. 167, № 3. – С. 581–589.
11. Chen J., Glasgow R. E. What is the Best Inguinal Hernia Repair? // Advances in surgery. – 2022. – Т. 56, № 1. – С. 247–258.
Review
For citations:
Ruziboev S.A., Sadikov R.A., Allaberdieyv N.A. Modification and results of alloplasty of inguinal hernias in the experiment. Title in english. 2025;20(3):21-28. (In Russ.)