Prospects and limitations of ultrasound diagnostics of congenital developmental defects of the fetus in the first trimester of pregnancy. A review
Abstract
Introduction. The article emphasizes the role of ultrasound (US) in the early detection of congenital developmental defects (CDD), particularly those crucial for the health and life of the future child. Focus is placed on the importance of screening in the first trimester of pregnancy to identify serious anomalies such as congenital heart defects (CHD).
Purpose. To illuminate the current state and future prospects of using US in the first trimester for diagnosing CDD, underscoring the significance of this approach for improving pregnancy outcomes and newborn health.
Materials and Methods. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The review covers retrospective and prospective studies published in medical journals, with an emphasis on the sensitivity and specificity of US.
Results and Discussion. Results of data analysis on the sensitivity and specificity of US in various studies are presented, along with a discussion on the impact of specialist qualifications and equipment quality on diagnostic accuracy. Technical capabilities and limitations of US, as well as the prospects for developing prenatal screening techniques, are considered.
Conclusion. US in the first trimester is a crucial tool for the early detection of CDD. Further improvement of US methods, specialist training, and standardization of research protocols are needed to enhance screening efficiency.
About the Authors
A. I. Mozer
Non-profit Joint Stock Company «Karaganda Medical University»
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Karaganda
E. I. Pak
Non-profit Joint Stock Company «Karaganda Medical University»
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Karaganda
N. A. Magaz
Non-profit Joint Stock Company «Karaganda Medical University»
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Karaganda
References
1. Duc N. M. et al. Detecting fetal central nervous system anomalies using magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound //Medical Archives. – 2021. – Т. 75. – №. 1. – С. 45.
2. Pimentel I., Costa J., Tavares Ó. Fetal MRI vs. fetal ultrasound in the diagnosis of pathologies of the central nervous system // European Journal of Public Health. – 2021. – Т. 31. – №. Supplement_2. – С. ckab120. 079
3. Zemet R. et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital head, face, and neck malformations—is complementary fetal MRI of value? // Prenatal diagnosis. – 2020. – Т. 40. – №. 1. – С. 142-150.
4. Adams N. C. et al. Fetal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: a primer on how to interpret prenatal lung lesions //Pediatric Radiology. – 2020. – Т. 50. – С. 1839-1854.
5. Marini D. et al. MR imaging of the fetal heart //Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. – 2020. – Т. 51. – №. 4. – С. 1030-1044.
6. Abbas H. M. et al. Additive value of fetal MRI to diff ultrasound modalities in diagnosis of fetal GIT and abdominal wall anomalies //Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. – 2023. – Т. 54. – №. 1. – С. 59.
7. Chauvin N. A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal musculoskeletal system //Pediatric Radiology. – 2020. – Т. 50. – С. 2009-2027.
8. Davidson J. R. et al. Fetal body MRI and its application to fetal and neonatal treatment: an illustrative review //The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. – 2021. – Т. 5. – №. 6. – С. 447-458.
9. Arthuis C. et al. MRI based morphological examination of the placenta //Placenta. – 2021. – Т. 115. – С. 20-26.
10. Sherer D. M. et al. Current perspectives of prenatal sonography of umbilical cord morphology //International Journal of Women's Health. – 2021. – С. 939-971.
11. Prayer D. et al. MRI of fetal acquired brain lesions //European journal of radiology. – 2006. – Т. 57. – №. 2. – С. 233-249.
12. Soares-Fernandes J. P. et al. Neonatal pyruvate dehydrogenase defi due to a R302H mutation in the PDHA1 gene: MRI fi //Pediatric Radiology. – 2008. – Т. 38. – С. 559-562.
13. Hu H. H. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of obesity and metabolic disorders: Summary from the 2019 ISMRM Workshop // Magnetic resonance in medicine. – 2020. – Т. 83. – №. 5. – С. 1565-1576.
14. Moroni I. et al. Cerebral white matter involvement in children with mitochondrial encephalopathies //Neuropediatrics. – 2002. – Т. 33. – №. 02. – С. 79-85.]
15. Singh A., Salehi S. S. M., Gholipour A. Deep predictive motion tracking in magnetic resonance imaging: application to fetal imaging //IEEE transactions on medical imaging. – 2020. – Т. 39. – №. 11. – С. 3523-3534.
16. Leyendecker J. R., Gorengaut V., Brown J. J. MR imaging of maternal diseases of the abdomen and pelvis during pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period //Radiographics. – 2004. – Т. 24. – №. 5. – С. 1301-1316.
17. Ertl-Wagner B. et al. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: indications, technique, anatomical considerations and a review of fetal abnormalities //European radiology. – 2002. – Т. 12. – №. 8. – С. 1931-1940.
18. Chaksuwat P. et al. A comparison of pregnancy outcomes after second-trimester amniocentesis between cases with penetration of the placenta and nonpenetration //The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. – 2021. – Т. 34. – №. 23. – С. 3883-3888.
19. Alfi Z., Navaratnam K., Mujezinovic F. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis //Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. – 2017. – №. 9.
20. Monni G. et al. The decline of amniocentesis and the increase of chorionic villus sampling in modern perinatal medicine //Journal of Perinatal Medicine. – 2020. – Т. 48. – №. 4. – С. 307-312.
21. Toufaily M. H. et al. Causes of congenital malformations //Birth defects research. – 2018. – Т. 110. – №. 2. – С. 87-91.
22. Corsello G., Giuff M. Congenital malformations //The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. – 2012. – Т. 25. – №. sup1. – С. 25-29.
23. Liu Y. et al. Global prevalence of congenital heart disease in school-age children: a meta-analysis and systematic review //BMC cardiovascular disorders. – 2020. – Т. 20. – С. 1-10.
24. Milani H. J. F. et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the fetal central nervous system: review of guidelines //Radiologia brasileira. – 2019. – Т. 52. – С. 176-181.
25. Imbard A., Benoist J. F., Blom H. J. Neural tube defects, folic acid and methylation //International journal of environmental research and public health. – 2013. – Т. 10. – №. 9. – С. 4352-4389.
26. Malinger G. et al. Ultrasonography of the prenatal brain.(3rd edn). Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Pilu G, Malinger G. – 2012.
27. Merguerian P. A., Rowe C. K. Developmental abnormalities of the genitourinary system //Avery's Diseases of the Newborn. – Elsevier, 2018. – С. 1260-1273. e4.
28. Pope J. C. 4th, Brock JW, 3rd, Adams MC, Stephens FD, Ichikawa I. How they begin and how they end: classic and new theories for the development and deterioration of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract, CAKUT //J Am Soc Nephrol. – 1999. – Т. 10. – №. 9. – С. 2018-28.
29. Ichikawa I. et al. Paradigm shift from classic anatomic theories to contemporary cell biological views of CAKUT //Kidney international. – 2002. – Т. 61. – №. 3. – С. 889-898.
30. Tokarska K. et al. Guidelines for treatment of esophageal atresia in the light of most recent publications //Polish Journal of Surgery. – 2022. – Т. 95. – №. 1. – С. 46-52.
31. Tonni G. et al. Clinical presentations and diagnostic imaging of vacterl association //Fetal and Pediatric Pathology. – 2023. – Т. 42. – №. 4. – С. 651-674.
32. van De Putte R. et al. Spectrum of congenital anomalies among VACTERL cases: a EUROCAT population-based study //Pediatric research. – 2020. – Т. 87. – №. 3. – С. 541-549.
33. Brzački V. et al. Congenital esophageal stenosis: a rare malformation of the foregut //Nagoya journal of medical science. – 2019. – Т. 81. – №. 4. – С. 535.
34. Oo A. M. Esophageal Cysts //Mastering Endo-Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery: ELSA Manual. – Singapore : Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. – С. 237-241.
35. Lavryk A. S. et al. Gastric duplication cyst //The Ukrainian Journal of Clinical Surgery. – 2021. – Т. 88. – №. 9-10. – С. 99-101.
36. Shah J. et al. Gastric diverticulum: a comprehensive review //Infl intestinal diseases. – 2019. – Т. 3. – №. 4. – С. 161-166.
37. Miscia M. E. et al. Duodenal atresia and associated intestinal atresia: a cohort study and review of the literature //Pediatric Surgery International. – 2019. – Т. 35. – С. 151-157.
38. Lindeman R. J., Søreide K. The many faces of Meckel’s diverticulum: update on management in incidental and symptomatic patients //Current gastroenterology reports. – 2020. – Т. 22. – С. 1-8.
39. Puri P., Nakamura H. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Hirschsprung’s disease //Hirschsprung's Disease and Allied Disorders. – 2019. – С. 167-174.
40. Miyake Y., Lane G. J., Yamataka A. Embryology and anatomy of anorectal malformations //Seminars in Pediatric Surgery. – WB Saunders, 2022. – Т. 31. – №. 6. – С. 151226.
41. Kagan K. O., Sonek J., Kozlowski P. Antenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities //Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. – 2022. – Т. 305. – №. 4. – С. 825-835.
42. Cuckle H., Morris J. Maternal age in the epidemiology of common autosomal trisomies //Prenatal diagnosis. – 2021. – Т. 41. – №. 5. – С. 573-583.
43. [Schierbaum L. M. et al. Genome-wide survey for microdeletions or-duplications in 155 patients with lower urinary tract obstructions (LUTO) //Genes. – 2021. – Т. 12. – №. 9. – С. 1449.
44. Berglund A., Stochholm K., Gravholt C. H. The epidemiology of sex chromosome abnormalities //American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics. – Hoboken, USA : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2020. – Т. 184. – №. 2. – С. 202-215.
45. Bronshtein M. et al. First-trimester and early second-trimester diagnosis of nuchal cystic hygroma by transvaginal sonography: diverse prognosis of the septated from the nonseptated lesion //American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. – 1989. – Т. 161. – №. 1. – С. 78-82.
46. Cuckle H. S., Nanchahal K., Wald N. Birth prevalence of Down's syndrome in England and Wales //Prenatal diagnosis. – 1991. – Т. 11. – №. 1. – С. 29-34.
47. Merkatz I. R. et al. An association between low maternal serum α-fetoprotein and fetal chromosomal abnormalities //American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. – 1984. – Т. 148. – №. 7. – С. 886-894.
48. Sherer D. M. et al. Noninvasive First-Trimester Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy //Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. – 1999. – Т. 54. – №. 11. – С. 42-48.
49. Malone F. D. et al. First-trimester nasal bone evaluation for aneuploidy in the general population //Obstetrics & Gynecology. – 2004. – Т. 104. – №. 6. – С. 1222-1228.
50. Cicero S. et al. Absence of nasal bone in fetuses with trisomy 21 at 11–14 weeks of gestation: an observational study //The lancet. – 2001. – Т. 358. – №. 9294. – С. 1665-1667.
51. Matias A. et al. Screening for chromosomal abnormalities at 10–14 weeks: the role of ductus venosus blood flow //Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. – 1998. – Т. 12. – №. 6. – С. 380-384.
52. Rasiah S. V. et al. A systematic review of the accuracy of first‐trimester ultrasound examination for detecting major congenital heart disease //Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. – 2006. – Т. 28. – №. 1. – С. 110-116.
53. Jeve Y. et al. Accuracy of f first‐trimester ultrasound in the diagnosis of early embryonic demise: a systematic review //Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. – 2011. – Т. 38. – №. 5. – С. 489-496.
54. Karim J. N. et al. Systematic review of first‐trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance //Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. – 2017. – Т. 50. – №. 4. – С. 429-441.
55. Spampinato M. D. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Point Of Care UltraSound (POCUS) in clinical practice: A retrospective, emergency department based study //Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. – 2024. – Т. 52. – №. 3. – С. 255-264.
56. Rayburn W. F., Jolley J. A., Simpson L. L. Advances in ultrasound imaging for congenital malformations during early gestation // Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology. – 2015. – Т. 103. – №. 4. – С. 260-268.
57. Christensen- Jeffries K. et al. Super-resolution ultrasound imaging //Ultrasound in medicine & biology. – 2020. – Т. 46. – №. 4. – С. 865-891.
58. Kvåle Løvmo M. et al. Ultrasound-induced reorientation for multi-angle optical coherence tomography //Nature Communications. – 2024. – Т. 15. – №. 1. – С. 2391.
59. Toprak U. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in subscapularis tendon abnormalities and the importance of operator experience //Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica. – 2020. – Т. 54. – №. 4. – С. 423.
60. Pugash D. et al. Prenatal ultrasound and fetal MRI: the comparative value of each modality in prenatal diagnosis //European journal of radiology. – 2008. – Т. 68. – №. 2. – С. 214-226.
61. Ioannou C. et al. Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size // BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. – 2012. – Т. 119. – №. 12. – С. 1425-1439.
62. Kuc R. Estimating acoustic attenuation from reflected ultrasound signals: Comparison // IEEE transactions on acoustics, speech, and signal processing. – 1984. – Т. 32. – №. 1. – С. 1-6.
63. Buca D. et al. Outcome of fetuses with congenital cytomegalovirus infection and normal ultrasound at diagnosis: systematic review and meta‐analysis //Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. – 2021. – Т. 57. – №. 4. – С. 551-559.
64. Carbone L. et al. Non-invasive prenatal testing: current perspectives and future challenges //Genes. – 2020. – Т. 12. – №. 1. – С. 15.
Review
For citations:
Mozer A.I., Pak E.I., Magaz N.A. Prospects and limitations of ultrasound diagnostics of congenital developmental defects of the fetus in the first trimester of pregnancy. A review. Title in english. 2024;19(3):25-32. (In Russ.)
Views:
72
Email this article 